Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <[email protected]> 13 Aug 2004 11:57:08 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.repo-coordination |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 08:59, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote: > OK, I've played around with this idea a bit; it is extremely easy to > implement. Please note: this is not carved in stone, I am merely playing > around. I hope to get input from all the repo-maintainers! > > o I decided to follow Dag's advice and use the keyworded version. > > o I decided to use the Distribution tag, for the reason discussed > earlier: that is does not show up in the rpm -qi listing. I tried using > the Vendor tag, and frankly, it screws up the nice display, since the > line tends to be long and wrap around. > > I am sure this would suit most everyone. I did a bit of checking on the > RPMs installed on my machine, and in most cases, the Distribution and > Vendor tags are almost identical: d=Red Hat Linux v=Red Hat Inc. for > example. > > - Dag's packages use the two inconsistently; some packages don't have the > Dist tag, some use almost the same string in both. > > - ATrpms never seems to use the Dist tag. > > - Freshrpms uses "Yarrow" or "Fedora" in the Dist tag, and "Freshrpms.net" > in the Vendor tag. > > ... so I conclude that probably noone will have really strong feelings > about this ;-) to add one more, Planet CCRMA currently uses: Distribution: Planet CCRMA -- Fernando