Re: kernel module versioning (was: Blackmailing ...)

On Thu, 6 May 2004, Axel Thimm wrote:

> On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 01:25:23PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 May 2004 13:15, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > o I had already written months ago that replacing kmdl vs
> > >   kernel-module is not an issue for me, using the broken versioning
> > >   scheme is.
> > 
> > For the confused (which includes me!) - Is the "broken versioning
> > scheme" the one Panu talks about here?
> 
> No, that's the sane one, i.e. one that contains the kernel
> version/release in the name tag of the rpm. Here are some references

I'll seriously start questioning my own sanity the day I start thinking a
names like kernel-module-alsa-2.4.22-1.2174.nptl are sane :) 
However it IS the only currently known technically correct solution to the
problem at hand, which is all that I care about, it's up to the higher
level tools to hide the hideousness from the user if at all possible.

	- Panu -