Re: rpmdb-redhat, rpmdb-Centos, etc..

On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:37 PM, seth vidal <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 11:30 -0700, Aaron Hanson wrote:
> > Hi All -
> >
> >       I've noticed that recent Redhat distros (RHEL5) and derivatives
> > (Centos5) seem to have stopped supplying resolution databases for the
> > '--aid' and '--redhatprovides' options. Does anybody have any insight
> > here? Where support for these options might be headed?
> >
>
> away.
>
> rpm --aid's depsolving has a lot of issues on modern distributions and
> packaging conventions. For the red hat-related distros (rhel, centos,
> fedora) it will not be a recommended solution. I hope in the
> not-so-distant future it will be removed altogether. If you want to do
> depsolving use one of the rpm depsolvers: (yum, smart, apt, etc)
>

You claim "lot of issues" and summarize "will not be a recommended solution"
for Red Hat distros.

Would you care to share any details? I'm unaware of "issues" that cannot be
solved,
and it's certainly useful to display package names that resolve dependencies
whether one ones to automate installing those packages with --aid (or not).

Or perhaps I should wait until the primary.sqlite yum download reaches 30Mb
instead of the ~6Mb currently seen on every Fedora 9 yum invocation with
updated metadata.

73 de Jeff

>
> -sv
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rpm-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
>

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list