Re: lets talk about dependancies again...
Jef Spaleta <[email protected]> 04 Oct 2002 12:06:14 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.grab |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1033747574.11967.14.camel@spatula> |
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 11:45, Jef Spaleta wrote: And to muddy the waters just a little bit.....here are some times from my redhat 7.3 system with rpm-4.0.4-7x.18 installed. Note this is on a totally different network than my beta box. >time rpm -qp --provides ftp://altruistic.lbl.gov/pub/repositories/redhat-8.0-i386/RPMS/4Suite-0.11.1-10.i386.rpm cDomlettec.so number.so Oifc.so Oqlc.so routines.so XPathParserc.so XPatternParserc.so XPointerParserc.so XPtrExprParserc.so 4Suite = 0.11.1-10 real 0m31.545s user 0m0.020s sys 0m0.030s >time /bin/rpm -Uvh --test ftp://altruistic.lbl.gov/pub/repositories/redhat-8.0-i386/RPMS/Canna-3.5b2-70.i386.rpm Retrieving ftp://altruistic.lbl.gov/pub/repositories/redhat-8.0-i386/RPMS/Canna-3.5b2-70.i386.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] real 1m3.688s user 0m0.860s sys 0m0.690s Now here times are longer than on the rpm4.1 system...but i think thats network overhead....the provides are still quicker than the test install though. So as of now I'm not convinced this is a problem inside rpm4.1... I need to move by beta box to rh8.0 to make sure...but I doubt I'll see much difference from what I've seen with the beta release installed. -jef
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA9nbx2rWLDmRitRZURAtIXAJ4lUsiFWIpNMyDYG7JVy5Ul0GFrfwCfUxXN jT6qqo52nusq27qQWGaJYZs= =ud9Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----