Re: lets talk about dependancies again...

Jef Spaleta <[email protected]> 04 Oct 2002 12:06:14 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.grab
Message-ID <1033747574.11967.14.camel@spatula>
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 11:45, Jef Spaleta wrote:

And to muddy the waters just a little bit.....here are some times from
my redhat 7.3 system with rpm-4.0.4-7x.18 installed. Note this is on a
totally different network than my beta box.


>time rpm -qp --provides
ftp://altruistic.lbl.gov/pub/repositories/redhat-8.0-i386/RPMS/4Suite-0.11.1-10.i386.rpm
cDomlettec.so  
number.so  
Oifc.so  
Oqlc.so  
routines.so  
XPathParserc.so  
XPatternParserc.so  
XPointerParserc.so  
XPtrExprParserc.so  
4Suite = 0.11.1-10

real    0m31.545s
user    0m0.020s
sys     0m0.030s

>time /bin/rpm -Uvh --test
ftp://altruistic.lbl.gov/pub/repositories/redhat-8.0-i386/RPMS/Canna-3.5b2-70.i386.rpm
Retrieving
ftp://altruistic.lbl.gov/pub/repositories/redhat-8.0-i386/RPMS/Canna-3.5b2-70.i386.rpm
Preparing...                ###########################################
[100%]

real    1m3.688s
user    0m0.860s
sys     0m0.690s


Now here times are longer than on the rpm4.1 system...but i think thats
network overhead....the provides are still quicker than the test install
though.   So as of now I'm not convinced this is a problem inside
rpm4.1... I need to move by beta box to rh8.0 to make sure...but I doubt
I'll see much difference from what I've seen with the beta release
installed.

-jef
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQA9nbx2rWLDmRitRZURAtIXAJ4lUsiFWIpNMyDYG7JVy5Ul0GFrfwCfUxXN
jT6qqo52nusq27qQWGaJYZs=
=ud9Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----