Re: lets talk about dependancies again...
Greg Kurtzer <[email protected]> Fri, 4 Oct 2002 08:05:19 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.grab |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Very weird indeed... I don't have a problem with the fact that your network seems to be responding faster then mine (maybe someone was downloading Warewulf (a large cluster toolkit) at the time), but what bothers me was the --provides took 2x longer then the --test install! That just did not make sence to me. Greg On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 12:06:14PM -0400, Jef Spaleta wrote: > On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 11:45, Jef Spaleta wrote: > > And to muddy the waters just a little bit.....here are some times from > my redhat 7.3 system with rpm-4.0.4-7x.18 installed. Note this is on a > totally different network than my beta box. > > > >time rpm -qp --provides > ftp://altruistic.lbl.gov/pub/repositories/redhat-8.0-i386/RPMS/4Suite-0.11.1-10.i386.rpm > cDomlettec.so > number.so > Oifc.so > Oqlc.so > routines.so > XPathParserc.so > XPatternParserc.so > XPointerParserc.so > XPtrExprParserc.so > 4Suite = 0.11.1-10 > > real 0m31.545s > user 0m0.020s > sys 0m0.030s > > >time /bin/rpm -Uvh --test > ftp://altruistic.lbl.gov/pub/repositories/redhat-8.0-i386/RPMS/Canna-3.5b2-70.i386.rpm > Retrieving > ftp://altruistic.lbl.gov/pub/repositories/redhat-8.0-i386/RPMS/Canna-3.5b2-70.i386.rpm > Preparing... ########################################### > [100%] > > real 1m3.688s > user 0m0.860s > sys 0m0.690s > > > Now here times are longer than on the rpm4.1 system...but i think thats > network overhead....the provides are still quicker than the test install > though. So as of now I'm not convinced this is a problem inside > rpm4.1... I need to move by beta box to rh8.0 to make sure...but I doubt > I'll see much difference from what I've seen with the beta release > installed. > > -jef -- Greg Kurtzer [email protected] http://www.runlevelzero.net LINUX,... The choice of a GNU generation! :wq