Re: rpm-python module

On Tuesday 24 August 2004 15:55, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 06:47:37AM -0700, Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
> > I wanted to have a Debian server
> > be able to host a yum repository made up of rpm packages
> > pushed up by an assortment of build machines), which led
> > him to look into upgrading rpm to a newer version - and
> > decide instead to drop it, ostensibly because a new
> > component has a license that conflicts with the Debian
> > guidelines.
>
> Any specific pointers on what is up here - debial-legal discussion, etc. 
> AFAIK rpm is and has always been lgpl/gpl dual licensed.

Google found the following interesting stuff:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/11/msg00215.html
http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DFSGLicences  (search for rpm)

kind regards,
Dries Verachtert