Re: FSF information (was : Re: Plea for a reasonable RHASv3 licenseoption)

Fair enough, it is a list provided by RedHat so it is well within their 
rights to define whats on topic.  This issue was resolved as far as I am 
concerned the day RHEL 3.0 was released and I downloaded off RHN, 
installed it and was presented with a end user license that made it quite 
clear what my/my companies rights were.

On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

> On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 23:02, [email protected] wrote:
> > I bet this thread would get more notice on the taroon release mailing list 
> > :)
> 
> or maybe not.
> The people you think you want to reach with these complaints/rants will
> not read either mailinglist anyway, all it'll achieve is to make said
> mailinglist useless to everyone else. I for one get a LOT of email on a
> day, and while I current read the taroon mailinglists and try to answer
> technical inquiries that are in my area, I won't waste my time if these
> lists are so full of off topic and misdirected flamewars. I'm not saying
> the points raised don't have merit, but these lists aren't the right
> place for them.
> 
> 

-- 
"People position you as the nemesis to Bill Gates. He started Microsoft and 
you started Linux, the big competition to Microsoft's dominance of operating 
systems. Is that an unfair or inaccurate characterization?" --New York Times

"Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely 
unintentional side effect. --Linus" 
                                                                              --


--
Taroon-beta-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list