Re: Red Hat's acquisition of Sistina Software (LVM) (December18th 2003)

Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:55:59 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.taroon
Organization Red Hat, Inc.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 14:52, Zate wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven said:
> > On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 08:55, ilja.lunev-//[email protected] wrote:
> >> Sorry,
> >>
> >> this was my mistake. I mean RHEL2.1
> >
> > well RHEL2.1 doesn't have LVM at all, and it's unlikely we'll ever add it
> > (it's basically a feature frozen product, esp now that RHEL3 is out for a
> > while, with LVM even)
> >
> 
> If RHEL3 is your flag ship you might want to talk to some of your 
> "partners" about providing drivers/support for it.  Ie Compaq.
> 
> You freeze 2.1 and throw out 3 which not everyone has full support for
> yet.  

Maybe you should think of this some: if we HADN'T frozen 2.1 at release
time but kept changing it like crazy, the vendors who's software you
require wouldn't have bothered to provide their stuff for a moving
target.

As for the Compaq drivers: I recommend avoiding those, they seem to give
a lot of troubles everywhere....
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQA//t0exULwo51rQBIRApuDAJjFcjCN46rMNrUNb8nYqmIAF5GpAJ48xXEF
JItkSWnbGCzTiw49HhxMgQ==
=9myP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----