Re: Red Hat's acquisition of Sistina Software (LVM) (December18th 2003)
Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:55:59 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.taroon |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 14:52, Zate wrote: > Arjan van de Ven said: > > On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 08:55, ilja.lunev-//[email protected] wrote: > >> Sorry, > >> > >> this was my mistake. I mean RHEL2.1 > > > > well RHEL2.1 doesn't have LVM at all, and it's unlikely we'll ever add it > > (it's basically a feature frozen product, esp now that RHEL3 is out for a > > while, with LVM even) > > > > If RHEL3 is your flag ship you might want to talk to some of your > "partners" about providing drivers/support for it. Ie Compaq. > > You freeze 2.1 and throw out 3 which not everyone has full support for > yet. Maybe you should think of this some: if we HADN'T frozen 2.1 at release time but kept changing it like crazy, the vendors who's software you require wouldn't have bothered to provide their stuff for a moving target. As for the Compaq drivers: I recommend avoiding those, they seem to give a lot of troubles everywhere....
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQA//t0exULwo51rQBIRApuDAJjFcjCN46rMNrUNb8nYqmIAF5GpAJ48xXEF JItkSWnbGCzTiw49HhxMgQ== =9myP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----