Re: IBM EM64T blades and SMP kernel panics
Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> Tue, 02 Nov 2004 22:35:13 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.taroon |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat UK |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============0093195567== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-T3kUjdAA+wFYC6UwhLW9" --=-T3kUjdAA+wFYC6UwhLW9 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 13:39 -0500, Vanco, Don wrote: > Does anyone here know anything about IBM HS20 blades based on EM64T not > being able to boot an SMP kernel? I've tried both U2 and U2, as well as > building my own ultra-stripped kernel and they panic instantly. I can't > get anything from IBM, the only info that I've found is something about > a change in FSB (from 533 to 800) that caused some issues. >=20 > I can boot the UP (ia32e) kernel as long as I supply acpi=3Doff - > otherwise that horks as well. what do you mean with the "SMP" kernel? the ia32e kernel *IS* SMP. there is no kernel-smp for ia32e! (and do not use the x86-64 kernels, they are for amd64 machines which have a slightly different instruction set) --=-T3kUjdAA+wFYC6UwhLW9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBh/2Ipv2rCoFn+CIRAqv7AJ92unoJVx30XF/iS3kSteDktXNWvACffTqq 7Jru7FIERsiz4kZ2o2Ir2mI= =de+M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-T3kUjdAA+wFYC6UwhLW9-- --===============0093195567== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline -- Taroon-beta-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list --===============0093195567==--