Re: Plea for a reasonable RHASv3 license option

Le lun 01/09/2003 à 02:30, Tom "spot" Callaway a écrit :
> On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 13:37, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> > Also not wanting to start a flamewar, I thank you for the good info.  I 
> > did not realize the GPL allowed for this, but now that I think about it I 
> > can't remember seeing anything in the GPL that would restrict RedHat from 
> > this. I am curious, is one required to renew the annual RHEL if they wish 
> > to continue using RedHat Advance Server, it appears from your quote that 
> > this is so?
> 
> IANAL, but I know we ran our RHEL subscription agreements and contracts
> by the FSF before introducing it, and they did not have any problems
> with it.
> 
> If you've got questions like this, I highly recommend you send them to
> [email protected] They are about the only people who can give a
> definitive answer.
> 

Done.

> ~spot
> 

-- 
Féliciano Matias <[email protected]>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/Uw8UAlHlXNHHbFMRAk2wAJ99gG/pPYX0GV4vXwHAXiQHQ6dB8ACggKxy
k0w4pbHuS6FGOquA6d64a3Q=
=DfyU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----