Re: Plea for a reasonable RHASv3 license option
Stephen Smoogen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.taroon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 31 Aug 2003, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: >On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 13:37, [email protected] wrote: > >> Also not wanting to start a flamewar, I thank you for the good info. I >> did not realize the GPL allowed for this, but now that I think about it I >> can't remember seeing anything in the GPL that would restrict RedHat from >> this. I am curious, is one required to renew the annual RHEL if they wish >> to continue using RedHat Advance Server, it appears from your quote that >> this is so? > >IANAL, but I know we ran our RHEL subscription agreements and contracts >by the FSF before introducing it, and they did not have any problems >with it. I have the feeling that if the FSF were to say publically that it was ok it wouldnt do anything other than make PHOFB[1] say that the FSF were hipocrites or had been bought out by Red Hat. [1] People hooked on Free Beer. -- Stephen John Smoogen [email protected] Los Alamos National Labrador CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 5-8058 Ta-03 SM-261 MailStop P208 DP 17U Los Alamos, NM 87545 -- So shines a good deed in a weary world. = Willy Wonka -- -- Taroon-beta-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list