Re: up2date aborts when no GPG signature is found.

Tim Powers <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.taroon
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 12:14, Douglas Phillipson wrote:
> There seem to be several packages that are not gpg signed on Redhat's 
> site for 3.0 Beta2.  Is it safe to just not require GPG sigs?  I don't 
> see an option to just abort the packages that don't have GPG sigs and 
> continue anyway.  It's a pain that up2date aborts when it finds a 
> package with no sig. Anyone else have this problem?

Which packages is it complaining about?

Also, have you already imported the beta key?:

  rpm --import /usr/share/doc/rpm-4.2.1/BETA-GPG-KEY


Tim


--
Taroon-beta-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.