Re: Attn: ia64 testers
Eric.Hagberg-/PgpppG8B+R7qynMiXIxWgC/[email protected]
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.taroon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.GSO.4.53.0309162112430.2721@udfpf2> |
Shouldn't it "just work" the same way as if I'd removed a bunch of ia64 rpms? Or at least work in a similar fashion? If you do "up2date --show-avail", none of the available 32-bit rpms show up at all. That just seems broken. Not to mention the inability to "rpm -Uvh $package.i386.rpm" once it is downloaded because there are conflicts in manpages and docs in /usr/share between the i386 and ia64 rpms. On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Adrian Likins wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 06:28:36PM -0400, Eric.Hagberg-/PgpppG8B+R7qynMiXIxWgC/[email protected] wrote: > > So, now those of us who removed all the packages you told us to need to > > manually "up2date --get" the i386/i686 packages listed in the channel > > file... and we can't just run "up2date --show-avail" to list those > > packages that need/can be reinstalled, as up2date doesn't figure out that > > those are there and not installed. > > > suggestions for the prefered mechanism to override that > welcome... aka, commandline arguments, config variables, etc... > > Adrian > > > -- > Taroon-beta-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list > > Eric Hagberg, Eric.Hagberg-/PgpppG8B+R7qynMiXIxWgC/[email protected], (212)762-2558 Morgan Stanley, 750 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10019 -- Taroon-beta-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list