Re: libobjc out of sync (x86_64 and ia64)?

I'm just curious, so please don't take this the wrong way, but would it be 
possible to isolate the beta channels from this sort of problem by 
"staging" the updates such that each channel is left in a known 
"pullable" state (where all the rpms in the channel are consistent with 
each other)?  Then when updates come they can be dropped into a new 
channel that gets swapped in to the beta channel (by moving a symlink?) 
when the pushed rpms are ok together.

On 19 Sep 2003, Tim Powers wrote:

> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 13:36, Eric.Hagberg-/PgpppG8B+R7qynMiXIxWgC/[email protected] wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Tim Powers wrote:
> > 
> > > This will be fixed in the push that's currently being sanity tested by
> > > QA.
> > 
> > The one that's now become available? I see that the kernel rpms for ia32,
> > ia64 and x86_64 are out there, but the problems in all the channels
> > regarding libobjc are still there:
> > 
> > - in the i386 channel, libobjc is missing
> > 
> > - in the ia64 channel, the native libobjc is missing and the i386 version
> >   in the channel is old (-18).
> > 
> > - in the x86_64 channel, the native libobjc is missing.
> 
> This is because the push is underway. Once I send the mail with the
> changelog information the push will have completed.
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> --
> Taroon-beta-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list
> 

-- 
Ryan Sweet <[email protected]>
Atos Origin Engineering Services
http://www.aoes.nl


--
Taroon-beta-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list