Re: Memory
Bill Nottingham <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Oct 2003 14:23:06 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.taroon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stephen Smoogen ([email protected]) said: > I think the range is so that when Joe who puts taroon on his 64 mb > webserver and things dont work exactly correctly, support can have a > quick checklist of items on fixing it. > > 'Sir we know you can run it in 64MB, but it is only tested in 256 mb or > more memory. Please bring the machine to the minimum levels, and see if > the problem still occurs.' > > While many hackers will chafe at having to go large on things... the > number of corporate webserver problems that go away by adding enough > memory (oh wow Jakarta now works) is startling. 256MB is the lowest *supported* amount of memory. Bill -- Taroon-beta-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list