Re: What happened to mailman
Stephen Smoogen <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:57:09 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.taroon |
|---|---|
| Organization | CCN-2 ESM/SSC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Phew.. we are running several large openldap-2.1 servers at the moment and I didnt want to have to start more audits :). That being said.. we have several large DB running via ldap at the moment, and have found that 2.1 is much more stable than our 2.0 machines.. just for a data point for RH to look at in the future. I will admit that I do not know how much of that stability is due to careful planning on our part to use well designed schema. On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 08:47, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Bill Nottingham ([email protected]) said: > > openldap-2.1 was not included I believe because of security > > reasons. > > Eeep, *stability* reasons, not security. I misspoke. Basically, > we were more comfortable with the testing we'd had with 2.0. > > Bill > > > -- > Taroon-beta-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list -- Stephen John Smoogen [email protected] Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645 Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545 -- So shines a good deed in a weary world. = Willy Wonka -- -- Taroon-beta-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list