Re: Hats on YUD, VAV, and NUN sufit in DejaVU
"Dov Grobgeld" <[email protected]> Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:31:28 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.region.israel.ivrix.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Since DejaVu is quite a new font and Hebrew support is even younger, I don't think that we should worry too much about an installed document base. As I said in the bugzilla page, the font is most similar to Nachlieli and Arial, and I think it should copy its look for this issue as well. Regarding diactrics, there already is support for that in DejaVu, though I have yet to investigate the quality of its tables. Regards, Dov P.S. I'm making quite a bit of progress with the programatic insertion of nikud into the Culmus fonts, and I hope to have something to show you in the next few days. On 9/26/06, Jonathan Ben Avraham <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dov, > I would leave the YUD and NUN-SOFIT as-is, straighten out the VAV. The > reasoning is as follows: > > This is a sans-serif font. The bend at the top of the NUN is not a serif > but balances the "foot" of the NUN. The bend at the top of the NUN-SOFIT > differentiates the glyph from the VAV but retains an identifying > similarity with the NUN. Neither the YUD nor the VAV need the bend. > > However - You also have to take into account the appearance of the > equivalent fonts for which this font will substitute and you have to > recalculate the metrics for any glyphs that you change, and you have to > take into account what this change will do to the installed document base > that already uses the font. We might be better off either not touching the > font or touching it and giving it a new name. If you are already thinking > about adding diacritics, then I think that we should give the font a new > name anyway, and then other changes won't be an issue. > Regards, > > - yba > > > On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Nadav Har'El wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:14:27 +0300 > > From: Nadav Har'El <nyh-TS7m/[email protected]> > > Reply-To: Ivrix Discussions <[email protected]> > > To: Ivrix Discussions <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: Hats on YUD, VAV, and NUN sufit in DejaVU > > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2006, Dov Grobgeld wrote about "Hats on YUD, VAV, and NUN sufit in DejaVU": > >> The main problem, imo, is that the YUD does not have a roof in the > >> font, but the VAV and the NUN-SUFIT do. In my opinion this is > >> inconsistent, and I filed a bug report to that extent: > > > > I wonder if the normal NUN shouldn't also be consistent with those three, > > also without a "roof". > > After all, shouldn't the NUN-SOFIT look like a "unfolded at the bottom" > > version of the NUN, just like you can see for PE, TSADI and KAF? > > > > But then again, looking at a random calendar on my desk printed in sans-serif > > font, it appears that the nun is not consistent with the others: yod, vav and > > nun-sofit don't have roofs, but nun does. > > > > It's a bit scary that 25 years after first learning to read, I suddenly > > realize that I'm actually unsure what the Hebrew letters should look like :) > > > > > > -- > EE 77 7F 30 4A 64 2E C5 83 5F E7 49 A6 82 29 BA ~. .~ Tk Open Systems > =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= > - [email protected] - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il - > ---- > Ivrix-discuss list. See http://ivrix.org.il. > To unsubscribe, please send mail to [email protected] with > only the following line in the message body (NOT SUBJECT!): unsubscribe > ---- Ivrix-discuss list. See http://ivrix.org.il. To unsubscribe, please send mail to [email protected] with only the following line in the message body (NOT SUBJECT!): unsubscribe