Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Seth Vidal <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.yum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 5:15 AM, James Antill <[email protected]> wrote: >> Although, for similar reasons, you may want to seriously think about >> using a rebuild of the yum-3.2.22-20 rpm from RHEL-5.4. > > Doesn't most relevant changes on yum from RHEL are contributed back to > upstream? In that sense, wouldn't the latest version of yum (3.2.25?) > be the one that has more bugfixes? > sure - but sometimes it is better to have consistent versions than to have the highest version. -sv _______________________________________________ Yum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum