Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Ljubomir Ljubojevic <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.yum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 5:15 AM, James Antill <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Although, for similar reasons, you may want to seriously think about >>> using a rebuild of the yum-3.2.22-20 rpm from RHEL-5.4. >> >> Doesn't most relevant changes on yum from RHEL are contributed back to >> upstream? In that sense, wouldn't the latest version of yum (3.2.25?) >> be the one that has more bugfixes? >> > > sure - but sometimes it is better to have consistent versions than to > have the highest version. > > -sv To stress this claim, notice the minor version on RHEL package (20). That means (should anyway) that someone made 20 fixes/additions/changes to pollish that version, and new version might have new stuff that has bugs need fixing. This is exact reason why RHEL/CentOS is so stable and bleeding edge distros have so much bugs and unstability. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Yum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum