Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Seth Vidal <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.yum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Seth Vidal wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 5:15 AM, James Antill <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Although, for similar reasons, you may want to seriously think about >>>> using a rebuild of the yum-3.2.22-20 rpm from RHEL-5.4. >>> >>> Doesn't most relevant changes on yum from RHEL are contributed back to >>> upstream? In that sense, wouldn't the latest version of yum (3.2.25?) >>> be the one that has more bugfixes? >>> >> >> sure - but sometimes it is better to have consistent versions than to have >> the highest version. >> >> -sv > > To stress this claim, notice the minor version on RHEL package (20). That > means (should anyway) that someone made 20 fixes/additions/changes to pollish > that version, and new version might have new stuff that has bugs need fixing. > > This is exact reason why RHEL/CentOS is so stable and bleeding edge distros > have so much bugs and unstability. > not exactly in the case of yum. I know reasonably well the set of patches in the yum in rhel5.4 -all the stuff that matters are upstream. -sv