Re: Has bug in xpdf-3.04 been fixed? [ANSWERED]
Rich Shepard via slackware <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Nov 2017 15:00:21 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.slackware |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, Didier Spaier via slackware wrote: > You would loose your time. This page: > https://packages.debian.org/sid/xpdf > provides a link to the Debian packaging: > http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xpdf/xpdf_3.04-5.debian.tar.xz > Which contains the patches in /patches included just two days ago and that > have certainly not applied in Slackware yet. Didier, OK. I'll get those patches too. The only one in -current is xpdfrc.diff.gz. > Better post this information on LQ so that the package be fixed there. > That will benefit all Slackware users of xpdf, not only you. Sure will. > As an aside I prefer atril, but I digress. Ah, of course. :-) Many like okular, epdfviewer, and all the others. I use mupdf when there's a document that xpdf-3.04 did not render correctly. One of the wonderful things about linux and all open-source software is that we have choices (sometimes too many) and it matters not which each of us prefers. I don't use vi/vim because of grad school experiences with line-oriented editors so I use emacs while my sysadmin friends swear by vi. Shrug. Best regards, Rich -- slackware mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/slackware