Re: Has bug in xpdf-3.04 been fixed? [ANSWERED]

Rich Shepard via slackware <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Nov 2017 15:00:21 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups gmane.linux.slackware
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, Didier Spaier via slackware wrote:

> You would loose your time. This page:
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/xpdf
> provides a link to the Debian packaging:
> http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xpdf/xpdf_3.04-5.debian.tar.xz
> Which contains the patches in /patches included just two days ago and that
> have certainly not applied in Slackware yet.

Didier,

   OK. I'll get those patches too. The only one in -current is
xpdfrc.diff.gz.

> Better post this information on LQ so that the package be fixed there.
> That will benefit all Slackware users of xpdf, not only you.

   Sure will.

> As an aside I prefer atril, but I digress.

   Ah, of course. :-) Many like okular, epdfviewer, and all the others. I use
mupdf when there's a document that xpdf-3.04 did not render correctly. One
of the wonderful things about linux and all open-source software is that we
have choices (sometimes too many) and it matters not which each of us
prefers. I don't use vi/vim because of grad school experiences with
line-oriented editors so I use emacs while my sysadmin friends swear by vi.
Shrug.

Best regards,

Rich


-- 
slackware mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/slackware