Re: fou4s update checking problems

"Kai Schaetzl" <[email protected]> Tue, 07 Dec 2004 16:31:25 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.suse.fou4s.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Markus Gaugusch wrote on Tue, 7 Dec 2004 07:35:17 +0100 (CET):

> No, Lars probably didn't, but I did. Fou4s.gaugusch.at is now running 
> apache2 since a week or so. 

Apologies. Of course. I mixed Lars Ellenberg and Markus Gaugusch to Lars 
Gaugusch in my mind ;-)

> I haven't seen the problem on any of my machines though. And I'm running 
> anything from SuSE 8.1 to 9.2. How can that be?
>

Hm, don't know. It happens on a 9.0 machine. I see that it doesn't happen 
on another 9.0 machine. Looking at the old thread from April I see that it 
happened back then only on 8.1 machines.

Here's the most relevant finding about the cause of the problem from back 
then:

So, the issue seem to be that leo (apache 2.0.49) does NOT include the 
 <Accept-Ranges: bytes 
 <Content-Length: 0 
 <Content-Range: bytes */1716 
information, which gwdg (apache 1.3.27) DOES provide. 
Maybe someone familiar with apache vs. apache can give a hint whether 
this is a apache config problem, a problem with the apache versions, 
a problem with the leo reply being out of spec (non-rfc-conform[tm]) or 
a problem with wget (mis)interpreting the server response.



Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org



--