Re: scim (intelligent) pinyin: Suggested words for simplified & traditional Chinese

"Ulrich Ruess (U)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.suse.m17n
Organization U.T.D.E.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
More than 10 years ago I have seen a study in Taiwan that shows that when 
entering the correct pronunciation and tone a hitrate of more than 90% for 
sentences could be reached. This means the technology is there.

Chinese in Taiwan who are trained to use computers tend to use CangJie and 
therefore do not have the issue.

Chinese in Taiwan who are using phonetic input would normally never think that 
entering something like "ren4" would be interpreted by the computer as 
Chinese. They would automatically enter ㄖㄣˋ and get a selection list (users 
of ZhuYin) or ㄖㄣˋㄕˋ and get 認識 (users of Chewing). Microsoft has similar 
solutions, but I have given up on them years ago and so cannot tell you much 
about them.

Uli





On Tuesday, November 15, 2005 10:15, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hello,
>
> naively I'd expect that the hits using traditional Chinese and using
> simplified Chinese would be the same - except for the different character.
> But somehow the simplified version guesses quite well, which character I
> want whereas the traditional Chinese version does not.
>
> Example: ren4shi (to know):
> a) Simplified: Typing "rensh" (or "renshi") suggest as first hit: 认识
> b) Traditional: Typing "renshi" gives: 人士, 人事, 人世 and 人氏 and
> then comes the list of all "ren" hits followed by all "shi" hits; that
> way one can finally get 認識, but it takes much longer.
>
> Can one improve the traditional version? Or do I do something wrong?
>
> Tobias
> who is a novice in terms of Chinese
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.