Re: IPA fonts updated to version 003.02
Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.suse.m17n |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <s5h4ofmy76s.wl%[email protected]> |
At Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:41:11 +0200,
I wrote:
>
> At Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:53:06 +0900,
> Satoru Matsumoto wrote:
> >
> > Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >
> > > I updated IPAGothic & co fonts to the newer version 003.02 on OBS M17N
> > > project. Let me know if any problem occurs with this update. This
> > > will be submitted to FACTORY later if no regression is found.
> >
> > Thanks for doing this.
> >
> > The problem is, that the look and feel of those newer fonts are
> > different from that of older ones. Newer fonts are a little bit thinner
> > than old ones and to be honest, I don't like them. :-(
> >
> > Please look at some screenshots for example:
> >
> > [KDE System Settings]
> > http://hyperion/heliosreds.homelinux.net/opensuse/sample/IPA_Fonts_003.01.png
> > http://hyperion/heliosreds.homelinux.net/opensuse/sample/IPA_Fonts_003.02.png
> >
> > [Firefox]
> > http://hyperion/heliosreds.homelinux.net/opensuse/sample/IPA_Fonts_003.01_firefox.png
> > http://hyperion/heliosreds.homelinux.net/opensuse/sample/IPA_Fonts_003.02_firefox.png
> >
> > [Kate]
> > http://hyperion/heliosreds.homelinux.net/opensuse/sample/IPA_Fonts_003.01_kate.png
> > http://hyperion/heliosreds.homelinux.net/opensuse/sample/IPA_Fonts_003.02_kate.png
> >
> > The difference between 003.01 and 003.02 is distinguished on Kate. In
> > addition, I've taken a screenshot of this Thunderbird window (UTF-8
> > encoding).
> >
> > http://hyperion/heliosreds.homelinux.net/opensuse/sample/IPA_Fonts_003.02_thundesbird.png
> >
> > You might agree that this is strange-looking and I can't see
> > 'underlines' in above URLs - 'underlines' and 'spaces' are not
> > discernible to the eye.
> >
> > Several months ago, I built Takao-fonts packages which are based on
> > version 003.02 of IPA fonts on my home project.
> > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=takao-fonts&project=home%3AHeliosReds
> > I encountered the similar problem with those fonts and I gave up
> > submitting a request to M17N.
> >
> > Is there any way to solve this problem ?
>
> These are definitely due to hinting setup. I personally prefer with
> hinting, but I agree that this often deforms glyph forms too badly.
>
> Try to put the following in ~/.fonts.conf:
>
> ================================================================
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "/etc/fonts/fonts.dtd">
> <fontconfig>
> <match target="font">
> <test name="family">
> <string>IPAexGothic</string>
> <string>IPAexMincho</string>
> <string>IPAMincho</string>
> <string>IPAGothic</string>
> <string>IPAPMincho</string>
> <string>IPAPGothic</string>
> </test>
> <edit name="hinting">
> <bool>false</bool>
> </edit>
> </match>
> </fontconfig>
> ================================================================
>
> This will disable hinting for the specified fonts.
> If this works better, we can put the rule into the package.
Also, instead of turning off the hinting completely, we can change
the hint style. It's a value from 0 to 3, or constants hintnone,
hintslight, hint medium, hintfull.
Try to put the following instead of the above to ~/.fonts.conf.
The hinting will be enabled a little bit (so you'll see a bit clearer
glyph), but shouldn't be deformed too much.
================================================================
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "/etc/fonts/fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
<match target="font">
<test name="family">
<string>IPAexGothic</string>
<string>IPAexMincho</string>
<string>IPAMincho</string>
<string>IPAGothic</string>
<string>IPAPMincho</string>
<string>IPAPGothic</string>
</test>
<edit name="hintstyle">
<const>hintslight</const>
</edit>
</match>
</fontconfig>
================================================================
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]