Re: [RFC]refactor Noto CJK fonts packaging

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:56:59 +0200,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
> 
> JFYI,
> 
> I accepted these two SR's, and now google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts and
> google-noto-serif-cjk-fonts landed to M17N:fonts project, as well as
> the drop of noto-*-cjk from google-noto-fonts.
> 
> I'm not sure whether noto-sans-*-fonts-full package name is the right
> thing.  Or better named to be noto-sans-*-full-fonts?  I don't mind
> either cases, so I'd like to hear others' opinions.
> 
> Now the most important task is to check whether the upgrade
> expectedly.  Once when confirmed to work, let's feed to FACTORY.

I tested the upgrade and it seems working.  So, basically we're ready
to submit to FACTORY.

As said, one remaining question is the naming of the full fontset.
Which is better: noto-sans-xx-fonts-full or noto-sans-xx-full-fonts?


thanks,

Takashi
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]