Re: [RFC]refactor Noto CJK fonts packaging

 > As said, one remaining question is the naming of the full fontset.
 > Which is better: noto-sans-xx-fonts-full or noto-sans-xx-full-fonts?

I prefer noto-sans-xx-fonts-full because the latter one looks a package
whose family name is "Noto Sanx XX Full".

--
Fuminobu TAKEYAMA

On 2017/05/04 22:32, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:56:59 +0200,
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>
>> JFYI,
>>
>> I accepted these two SR's, and now google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts and
>> google-noto-serif-cjk-fonts landed to M17N:fonts project, as well as
>> the drop of noto-*-cjk from google-noto-fonts.
>>
>> I'm not sure whether noto-sans-*-fonts-full package name is the right
>> thing.  Or better named to be noto-sans-*-full-fonts?  I don't mind
>> either cases, so I'd like to hear others' opinions.
>>
>> Now the most important task is to check whether the upgrade
>> expectedly.  Once when confirmed to work, let's feed to FACTORY.
>
> I tested the upgrade and it seems working.  So, basically we're ready
> to submit to FACTORY.
>
> As said, one remaining question is the naming of the full fontset.
> Which is better: noto-sans-xx-fonts-full or noto-sans-xx-full-fonts?
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi
>
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]