Re: [suse-oracle] Deadline Scheduler and XFS file system
Maxim Tkachenko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.suse.oracle.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi. I think that the best option would be to use ASM. File System + LVM will spend more resources than the ASM. If in order to increase the resources, I think that the so - ASM - FileSystem - LVM + FileSystem 2009/12/4 Austin Joseph <[email protected]> > Hi List , > > 1 ) I would like to know if changing the default scheduler from CFQ to > Deadline can have a significant impact on performance for large busy Oracle > Database ( Oracle/SAP ) attached to SAN ? > > There are document to the effect which mentions Deadline scheduler is good > for Database. > > > 2 ) Does Reiserfs file system have any performance issue when used with > LVM for Oracle database , Is XFS is a better file system to go by for > Database on SLES ? > > One of my customer feel Reiserfs is not ideal for Oracle Database and is > moving to Veritas File system as they feel Veritas offer better performance. > > Thanks & Regards > Austin > > > > _______________________________________________ > suse-oracle mailing list > [email protected] > http://listx.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/suse-oracle > _______________________________________________ suse-oracle mailing list [email protected] http://listx.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/suse-oracle