Re: [suse-oracle] Deadline Scheduler and XFS file system

Maxim Tkachenko <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.suse.oracle.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi.
I think that the best option would be to use ASM. File System + LVM will
spend more resources than the ASM.
If in order to increase the resources, I think that the so
 - ASM
 - FileSystem
 - LVM + FileSystem



2009/12/4 Austin Joseph <[email protected]>

> Hi List ,
>
> 1 )   I would like to know if  changing the default scheduler from CFQ to
> Deadline can have a significant impact on performance for large busy Oracle
> Database ( Oracle/SAP ) attached to SAN ?
>
> There are document to the effect which mentions Deadline scheduler is good
> for Database.
>
>
> 2 )  Does Reiserfs file system have any performance issue when used with
> LVM for Oracle database , Is XFS is a better file system to go by for
> Database  on SLES ?
>
> One of my  customer feel Reiserfs is not ideal for Oracle Database and is
> moving to Veritas File system as they feel Veritas offer better performance.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Austin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> suse-oracle mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listx.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/suse-oracle
>

_______________________________________________
suse-oracle mailing list
[email protected]
http://listx.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/suse-oracle
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.