Re: Possible SPAM (accuracy low): Re: [suse-sparc] Possible SPAM (accuracy low): Freeswan and SuSE Sparc Linux
Ed Coates <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.suse.sparc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quoting Nick Thompson <[email protected]>: > > You may possibly be right about not needing the capabilities of iptables, > but > > what do I when I take your advice, and then encounter the same problems > when > > I "graduate," to 2.4? > > > > Stay with 2.2. I have. No problems to date. Half of my office Sparcs still > run 2.2 kernel. And my home firewall is still running 2.2 kernel, including > wireless lan support. > Thanks for the advice, and I may have to eventually do just that, but in the mean time, I'd really like to find a way to make it work with the 2.4 kernel if possible. I'm guessing that there's a problem with rsasigkey and the 32bit kernel associtated with 2.4. I would love to be able to dive right in and tackle it myself, but I'm a scripter, and not a programmer. :( Ed ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/