Re: Help with Intel Pro/1000 GT NIC
"Steve Campbell" <campbell-TtXmYh9KqR1Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:19:00 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.tao.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <003d01c5e153$158a2f80$bc01a8c0@DDF5DW71> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bogdan Costescu" <Bogdan.Costescu-hEciA7+sKtudPOQpRHQ53DeJuz7u0hKX@public.gmane.org> To: "Steve Campbell" <campbell-TtXmYh9KqR1Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 8:59 AM Subject: Re: [Tao-discuss] Help with Intel Pro/1000 GT NIC > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Steve Campbell wrote: > >> Besides, I don't really want to make my own kernel, as I would be >> locked into it without kernel RPM updates. > > Huh ? Your idea was to continue to use the U2 kernel, which means that > you would have been locked to it, no kernel updates allowed - > obviously because then you'd start having problems with the KVM. > Having your kernel to be locked to is not at all different.... > In a round-about way, yes. If I stuck to U2, at least everything worked, but I was stuck at U2. If I upgraded kernels by configuring them manually, I was stuck with manually configuring them each time I upgraded. I was taking the lazy way out and leaving things as they are. It also eliminates breaking something else during a manual kernel build. As I said, I am between a rock and a hard place - no win situation. But alas, I may have found a solution by using the SVGA X configuration instead of the probed Dell monitor. Thanks for the help Steve > -- > Bogdan Costescu > > IWR - Interdisziplinaeres Zentrum fuer Wissenschaftliches Rechnen > Universitaet Heidelberg, INF 368, D-69120 Heidelberg, GERMANY > Telephone: +49 6221 54 8869, Telefax: +49 6221 54 8868 > E-mail: Bogdan.Costescu-PDzUyZpvkMP/PDbm/[email protected] >