Re: centos conversion

Ed Wilts <[email protected]> Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:12:39 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.linux.tao.general
Organization (ewilts)
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 10:19:59PM -0400, fredex wrote:
> I've been waiting to see how others fare with the centos conversion before
> I attempt converting my main box.

My conversion was nice and smooth.  I've added files from multiple
repositories and I had been on Tao4 since April/2005.
 
> My main box was an upgrade from tao1 to tao4, and since becoming tao4
> has had yum modified to support the protectbase plugin, and a couple of
> other repositories added.
> 
> What I haven't figured out from the postings I've seen, and what I'm not
> smart enough to figure out for myself, is if those changes in the yum
> configuration I've made will have any negative impact on the centos
> conversion. 

I didn't have the protectbase plugin before I converted but I added it
later.  It hasn't broken anything but I haven't seen any conflicts yet
that protectbase would protect me from.  In the past, I had explicitely
listed packages in Dag's archives that I wanted to be able to install.
I'm now use protectbase and using the rpmforge yum files instead of only
referencing Dag's archive.

One thing you'll have to watch for is that the migration renames your
other repository files.  When your migration is complete, don't forget
to rename them back.  You should then do a yum check-update to see
what the current state of affairs is.  I also regularly do a yum list
and pipe that to a file for easy grep'ing.

If you have any issues after you migrate, feel free to holler to the
list and we'll help you through whatever didn't work quite right.

        .../Ed

-- 
Ed Wilts, RHCE
Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[email protected]
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program