Re: going backwards in time and copyrights

Vagrant Cascadian <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.terminal-server.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:10:28PM +0100, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> as you might have noticed by the commits i did today that i tried to
> unify the copyright headers in the scripts (for now only the toplevel
> files in server/ and client/ but i would like to go on with this for all
> files). the format is in a way that it should be easy to comprehend the
> history of a file from its header. 

thanks for getting that rolling! it's not a particularly fun task.
 
> one file i couldnt really make out from where or how the existing
> copyright header was assembled is client/screen-x-common. it apparently
> lists jim with a date of 2002 as the original author at the very top,
> has a Canonical LTD. boilerplate a bit lower and between these two lists
> warren and vagrant as authors in 2008. the file never existed in the
> earlier ltsp5 trees (or i'm really blind) so the canonical boilerplate
> is surely wrong. i also belive that it wasnt created by jim in 2002
> (since it entered the code tree only in 2008) nor can i find any trace
> of warren having ever committed to that code ... 
> the first commit i can see is from vagrant on march 21st 2008, with some
> later commits from scott and gadi. can someone enlighten me about the
> header which imho should rather look like below:
> 
> ---
> #
> # Copyright (c) 2008 Vagrant Cascadian <[email protected]>
> #
> # 2008, Scott Balneaves <[email protected]>
> #       Gideon Romm <[email protected]>
> #
> ---

all or most of that code was originally part of another script or other scripts
(though i forget exactly which), and i merely copied the copyright information
over, as it was nearly impossible to distinguish what parts of the code it
applied to. i suspect quite possibly some (potentially small part) of the code
does come from jim back in 2002, and maybe used the boilerplate thing from
canonical with permission from jim.

i wouldn't be surprised if warren did contribute to the code in some way, even
if not represented from commit logs, as we all work on stuff collaboratively,
no?

that's what i can assemble from an imperfect memory, at least.

live well,
  vagrant

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-developer mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-developer
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.