Re: low RAM usage
CyberOrg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.terminal-server.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Michael Shigorin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:08:46PM +0530, CyberOrg wrote: > > Don't know about RAM, I am able to boot PC with 128M ram fine, > > And we're able to boot in 16M with pulse enabled. ;) > Production ISO images happily run clients with 24M RAM. > > 32M is a synonim for "Pentium MMX" largely, while > 16M is a synonim for "Pentium". > Whoa! I I don't think we'd be able to get our current implementation to boot on 16MB. Last thing that boots on 16M ram is ltsp4.2. We might barely be able to do with 64M ram, I'd be happy if it does that. -J ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-developer mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-developer For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net