| Newsgroups |
gmane.linux.terminal-server.devel |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 11:10:27AM +0530, CyberOrg wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Michael Shigorin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 08:41:42AM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> > > > Let us replace it with what everyone has on the distro so the
> > > > default theme look good.
> > > sounds reasonable, and it's easy enough to apply a patch at
> > > package build time if needed/desired for distro-specific
> > > consistancy.
> > BTW ideally, it's not a patch but substitution (or a separate
> > file describing design which can even be replaced at runtime).
> We are talking about the default LTSP theme(upstream) here, there
> should not be any patching required on that, if it requires patching
> there is a bug that needs to be addressed, I am sure there is
> clearlook, industrial or some such generic engine that is available on
> all distros.
let me make myself clearer... i meant that we should change it,
upstream, to a commonly agreed upon distro-agnostic engine
(clearlooks?). if distros want their preferred engine, they can set it
at package build time (through patches or other mechanisms). it's just a
gtkrc text file.
live well,
vagrant
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-developer mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-developer
For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net