Re: LocalApps possible help, delai or solution?
"PAGE Laurent" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.terminal-server.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for your answers No, Firefox use 80-100% of CPU, but of course it's Flash, my enterprise is a web agency, so we can't use adblock or other flash blocker There is no solution for run firefox and his plugins on local terminal? 2008/4/2, jam <[email protected]>: > > On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 12:05 -0700, > > ltsp-developer-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org wrote: > > Hi All, > > sorry for my English.. > > thanks for this splendid system > > > > > But, I have 6 ThinClients connected to my 2,5Ghz 2048Mo server Ubuntu > > > with LTSP5, > > and when all ThinClients use FireFox, 2 CPU's server use 99% of > > resources. > > > > > I try to find how to implement Firefox as LocalApps but I didn't find > > anything... > > > > I see that you want to implement easy function in future LTSP 5.2(?) > > so I want to know when you distribe this update? > > > > I want to downgrade to LTSP4.1, LocalApps is much easy to install, I > > find resource with Google > > > > Can you help me? Downgrade or wait? or solution? > > > Don't downgrade, 4's old and not supported. If it works fine else you > are on your own. > > Just running 6 firefox's does not use 99% CPU, so what are they doing ? > If they use 99% memory your system IS working properly. It is supposed > to use all memory, not waste it by not using it. > If you are using SWAP you don't have enough RAM (again tricky: Putting > unused ram into SWAP is Good, swapping inuse RAM is Bad (for > performance) > > Now the world gets tricky: For 1G RAM and over you should be running a > 64 bit system. If you look technically how BIGRAM works you will see > that despite everyone's opinions whichever way 64bit is the only option. > This is especially true with ThinClients where simultainious apps are > running as opposed to 'lots of serial apps' which is better suited to > BIGRAM. > So IMHO you do not give good reason for local apps. Hey it's your > system, you do what you like, I'm just arguing how-hard vs the-benefit > > Also to run local apps you will need to have 512M+ in each client. > > LocalApps will happen, they are WIP. I tried because I wanted skype. In > the end a fat-client was easier. > > James > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > _____________________________________________________________________ > Ltsp-developer mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-developer > For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net > -- OBJECTIF CLIC - PAGE Laurent - Directeur Lot II A38 Antaninandro - 101 Antananarivo - Madagascar RCS : 2007B00367 NIF :0158113 STAT : 64221112007010372 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-developer mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-developer For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net