Re: Compressed caching improves LTSP memory efficiency
Michael Shigorin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.terminal-server.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 01:56:47PM +0800, Nai Xia wrote: > >> We have done some testing in LTSP of debian with limited > >> memory and analyzed the memory behavior of two popular > >> program -- kpdf & firefox. The result shows compcache > >> greatly improves the memory efficiency. > > BTW there's a patch for a bit better-grained compression > > status -- are you interested? (the results are good, +1) > I'm glad to merge your patch to my personal testing branch of > compcache and do some test on it . :) > The project master -- Nitin Gupta is trying to merge the > current code to the mainline, so I am afraid he may not merge > any new patches except bug-fixing ones for the time being. Wow, very good. Hope he succeeds, and you can use these messages as yet another "+1" on its robustness and usefulness (I'm having uptimes like a month on a compcached terminal, mostly interrupted due to power outages or rare experiments). > And what about the CPU consumption of that algo. ? > Do you have benchmark numbers ? It's about reporting, not about compression itself -- adds "very good" (IIRC 4x) compression ratio estimation into /proc file. 2 led: mail the compcache patch pls :) -- ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin <mike-u2l5PoMzF/[email protected]> ------ Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-developer mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-developer For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net