Re: diff list 1 vs. 2, request for opinions what to put in
Charles Curley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.tomsrtbt |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:00:29PM -0400, Tom Oehser wrote: > > As far as I can tell, the meaningful differences that happenstance > brought, between 1 and 2, as listed below. Please tell me what you > think should go back in- there is lots of space I have freed up, and > more coming, but, I need feedback on what people are actually using. I use ppa.o on my application, and would like to have emacs. I could, if necessary, read up on vi. Or if emacs were made available separately I could put it on my zip disks as I build them. But I have to have ppa on the tomsrtbt floppy so I can get to the zip disk. Or I could stick with tomsrtbt-1.7.366, which does just fine. Thanks. -- Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley / \ No M$ Word docs in email
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8v5M///ZMSE7N39sRAqW/AJ9xwTxBeCKmCGeqkQNMo5KGYh3krACfaX+t S87bGWajO0cnQftr0IK7o+M= =BaV7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----