Re: diff list 1 vs. 2, request for opinions what to put in

Charles Curley <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.tomsrtbt
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:00:29PM -0400, Tom Oehser wrote:
> 
> As far as I can tell, the meaningful differences that happenstance
> brought, between 1 and 2, as listed below.  Please tell me what you
> think should go back in- there is lots of space I have freed up, and
> more coming, but, I need feedback on what people are actually using.

I use ppa.o on my application, and would like to have emacs.

I could, if necessary, read up on vi. Or if emacs were made available
separately I could put it on my zip disks as I build them.

But I have to have ppa on the tomsrtbt floppy so I can get to the zip
disk.

Or I could stick with tomsrtbt-1.7.366, which does just fine.

Thanks.

-- 

Charles Curley                  /"\    ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Looking for fine software       \ /    Respect for open standards
and/or writing?                  X     No HTML/RTF in email
http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley     / \    No M$ Word docs in email
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8v5M///ZMSE7N39sRAqW/AJ9xwTxBeCKmCGeqkQNMo5KGYh3krACfaX+t
S87bGWajO0cnQftr0IK7o+M=
=BaV7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.