Re: Software bloat
"Daniel C. von Asmuth" <asmuth-8LkvcxCLB6JmR6Xm/[email protected]> Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:05:59 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Aldus quoth Dexter Filmore on Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 05:17:10PM +0100: > > 128MB is sub-standard. There isn't any miracle about KDE or OO being slow with > such an relict. 256MB is minimum on Linux as well as on Win, no Pentium5 6GHz > will help you here. > Besides: OO is shoddy when you try setting up a printer and print. I got a HP > LJ4 whcih is well supported and spadmin still gave me hell. (What on earth is > the command line for cups?!) The minimum requirements for Linux are an i386 processor with 2 MB or RAM and some 10 MB of disk. (you would need a pretty old version for this to work). I suppose anything that requires 256 MB for any lesser task than high-resolu- tion climate modelling is itself substandard. (for Windows 4 MB is recommended). Now suppose you had a box with eight Pentium 5 processors @6 GHz, 16 GB of RAM, 1 TB of U-320 RAID-5 disk storage and dual 10Gbit/s Ethernet, how many simul- taneous users with OO 1.1 would this be able to support with reasonable per- formance (such as responding to keystrokes and mouse moves within 1 sec)? merry tuXmas, eep, eep, eep. Daniel -- Bij de dummies die dwalen in het land van Redmond is een lichtje gaan branden toen zij de boodschap uit cyberspace hoorden dat er een Kernel was geboren die hen zou bevrijden van de Longhorn