Linux vs Windows Firewalls
"PK Carlisle" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3F5D02DB.3535.15BC09@localhost> |
I am new to playing with Linux so I admit that I could very well be wrong about this... Looking through the docs for the Linux firewall, it seems that if you accept packets on, for example, port 80, then -any program- can communicate on port 80, you cannot limit which programs can communicate with the internet, so you could not automatically block spyware, etc., that is, you cannot automatically block any program not on a list approved to communicate with the internet. OTOH, my Windows firewall lets me say that program X may communicate on port n and -only- that program may communicate that way unless there's another rule specifically allowing another program access on that port; registry checking assures that no application masquerades as another. Am I wrong or can it be that my Windows system is -significantly- more secure online than Linux?? ================================ PGP Public Key: http://home.earthlink.net/~mrgoodbytes/pkpubpgp.asc Earthlink, AOL, Yahoo IM: mrgoodbytesIM VOX: 708-296-2466 FAX: 708-452-8594