Re: Cut-Copy/Paste behavior
Ken Arromdee <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Lawrence MacIntyre wrote: > Calling people names doesn't help anyone and only makes you look bad. > When Dee-Ann writes her book, she's not going to find anything useful in > your posts, but then nobody else found anything useful in them either. > Please limit your replies to useful suggestions (I'm dreaming there) and > complaints (much more likely, but so far, we've seen only name-calling). You're not seriously suggesting my post detailing the problem was name-calling, I hope? If you want a useful suggestion, I'd suggest this: 1) Make ^C, ^V, and the menu use the same buffer that left-click/middle-click do. Get rid of the extra buffer. 2) The ability to paste text that is currently highlighted just is not consistent with the ability to highlight text but paste something else onto it. Linux tries to do the former, while a lot of people, especially Windows users, find the latter much more useful. There needs to be some way for the user to choose the two behaviors, either by having two methods of pasting, or by having some kind of user-settable option controlling the behavior of paste. Too many options are a bad idea, but this one seems necessary. 3) At the very least, buggy applications should be fixed. Mozilla doesn't implement even the weird Linux cut and paste method properly. The response to someone pointing out those bugs should not be "use another application" when the application is as prominent as Mozilla. And once the bug is reported, fixing it should not take 3 years. Bugs that have been around a while should be given higher priority for fixing.