RE: Linux vs Windows Firewalls
"Ridgeway, Alan" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> If you read news papers or news sites, you will find out which OS has the worst leaks. This does not address the question. Please support your argument. >A firewall is mostly used for stopping bad guys from coming in. So I guess you aren't a good Internet neighbor and don't run egress filtering. I try to have my firewall keep bad guys out and bad guy exploits from getting out. Alan -----Original Message----- From: annoyances-admin-DzJonyRHso41Ayx8vbq1stBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org [mailto:annoyances-admin-DzJonyRHso41Ayx8vbq1stBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org]On Behalf Of Daniel C. von Asmuth Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 12:38 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Annoyances] Linux vs Windows Firewalls Thus spake PK Carlisle on Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 09:10:49AM -0500: > Care to add some substance regarding HOW I'm wrong? No. If you read news papers or news sites, you will find out which OS has the worst leaks. B.t.w. for some reason many sites are using a BSD- derived OS rather than Linux. > Precisely how, given the limitation in the Linux firewall pointed out, > is Linux to be made more secure? Opening a port to every > program that wants to communicate over that port seems sloppy > and risky. If you care to read the manual you will find out that only programs with root priviliges are allowed to open ports below number 1024. A firewall is mostly used for stopping bad guys from coming in. Daniel von Asmuth > ------------------------ > > If god had not created yellow honey, men would think figs sweeter than they do. If Gates had intended us to use Windows, he would have given us three hands. _______________________________________________ annoyances mailing list [email protected] http://michelangelo.renaissoft.com/mailman/listinfo/annoyances