Re: Thin Terminals
Richard.Corfield.Admin-XZoyATsUNX5Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Don't get me wrong, I'm not against terminals. They > definitely do have a place and are irreplacable: but > personal workstations *also* have a place and are > *also* irreplacable. One of the biggest complaints against thin terminal is what happens if the network fails. We all go home (and with best of luck stay home all day, even if they did only take half an hour to fix it ;-). The thing is, so many people I work with are at complete loss without the network. They lose email, central document stores, and for most of the people I work with they lose database and Datastage connectivity. Back in the early days of my career, the mainframe (3270 terminals, hmmm) only failed once or twice per year, so productivity loss was not bad. Other attempts come, things like the "Java Termainls", you could say either overweight thin terminals or underweight fat clients. They can cache code and data locally, and use local processing power. Technology is coming into place to do this, such as Java Web Start, or even file systems such as CODA. I've seen Solaris workgroups set up with cacheing network filesystems holding apps (big CAD systems), NFS for user data, and working really well. Its just a different way of working. For the management types, Total Cost of Ownership(tm) in such a system is reduced because you manage the software install image in one place and it automaticaly replicates itself to all users. I've never seen a Windows system do that. Where I work, IT support have to come visit to install or upgrade software on every machine. What a waste. For the home, if we can get the connectivity (a big if), having something so simple, something with effectively no persistant state after power off, will help the end user. The computer will become an appliance. Microsoft did, rightly, see the thin client or Java Station like client as a threat. They also saw the web as a threat. Appliances are a threat, hence the push for WinCE and trying to make Internet Explorer the lock in standard. It takes a big marketing campaign to make users care what operating system an appliance runs. These technologies remove Windows as the platform. Even now though, I develop to Java and Oracle, and don't care really what platform is used - well, apart from I'm quite happy to see my company considering Linux. - Richard -- _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ Richard dot Corfield at ntlworld dot com _/ _/ _/ _/ Fortune Cookie: It is your concern when your _/_/ _/ _/ neighbor's wall is on fire. -- Quintus _/ _/ _/_/ _/_/_/ Horatius Flaccus (Horace)