Re: PCMCIA, performance, Open Office
Dexter Filmore <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:42:12 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Organization | SCHWA Corporation |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > 2) Why can't we have a distribution that's as fast and light as slackware, > but has all the software SuSE or Mandrake does? And for that matter, why > can't KDE run as fast as Blackbox or WindowMaker? Don't give me this > nonsense about C++ and linking problems...I want speed, darn it! You can have any app you want in slackware as long as the src is available. This might sound annoying, but I developed a tendency to compile src *anyway*. On most apps a simple ./configure && make && checkinstall -S will do fine, plus I get all the ./configure options I want (in xine for example) plus I get all the CPU optimizations for my AthlonXP I want. My Slackware hums like a racing car. Ok, that might be the IBM disk ;) About KDE: I used to be a die hard Gnome fan despite Gnome getting worse with every version since they started Gnome2 (haven't tried 2.4 yet tho, afraid of upgrading...). But recently I installed KDE3.1.2 to help a newbie friend with setup and found myself rising an eyebrow. On my AthlonXP 1800+@1533MHz and Radeon9700 this thing is surprisingly fast. Don't know how it behaves when it has been used and upgraded and extended for a while, but for now I seriously consider switching, alone to get rid of that GODFORSAKEN sorry excuse for a file manager called Nautilus. Dex -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d--(+)@ s-:+ a-- C++(+++) UL>+++ P+>++ L++>++++ E-- W++ N+ o? K- w--(---) !O M-- V- PS+ PE(+) Y+>++ PGP- t+(++) 5 X+(++) R++ tv--(+)@ b++(+++) DI+++ D G++(--) e* h r%>* y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ http://www.againsttcpa.com - nothing fights like the opposition