Re: PCMCIA, performance, Open Office

Dexter Filmore <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:42:12 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usability.annoyances
Organization SCHWA Corporation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> 
> 2) Why can't we have a distribution that's as fast and light as slackware,
> but has all the software SuSE or Mandrake does? And for that matter, why
> can't KDE run as fast as Blackbox or WindowMaker? Don't give me this
> nonsense about C++ and linking problems...I want speed, darn it!

You can have any app you want in slackware as long as the src is available.
This might sound annoying, but I developed a tendency to compile src *anyway*.
On most apps a simple ./configure && make && checkinstall -S will do fine,
plus I get all the ./configure options I want (in xine for example) plus I get
all the CPU optimizations for my AthlonXP I want. My Slackware hums like a
racing car. Ok, that might be the IBM disk ;)

About KDE: I used to be a die hard Gnome fan despite Gnome getting worse with
every version since they started Gnome2 (haven't tried 2.4 yet tho, afraid of
upgrading...). But recently I installed KDE3.1.2 to help a newbie friend with
setup and found myself rising an eyebrow.
On my AthlonXP 1800+@1533MHz and Radeon9700 this thing is surprisingly fast.
Don't know how it behaves when it has been used and upgraded and extended for
a while, but for now I seriously consider switching, alone to get rid of that
GODFORSAKEN sorry excuse for a file manager called Nautilus.

Dex


-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d--(+)@ s-:+ a-- C++(+++) UL>+++ P+>++ L++>++++ E-- W++ N+ o? K- w--(---) 
!O M-- V- PS+ PE(+) Y+>++ PGP- t+(++) 5 X+(++) R++ tv--(+)@ b++(+++) DI+++ D 
G++(--) e* h r%>* y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

http://www.againsttcpa.com - nothing fights like the opposition