RPM should be renamed to WTF
Dexter Filmore <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:23:09 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Organization | SCHWA Corporation |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Why does any company which makes first steps towards linux assume RPM was the answer of the Gods? I happily run Slackware, and If I switch one day (because updating SW is a hassle) it's gonna be debian for sure - no rpm there either (for Bob's sake!). Now being the owner of a Radeon board I installed the ATI drivers but had to use rpm, so it won't show up in /var/log/packages, where SW stores info about installed software. Upgrading those drivers is even more fun. Ok, I could rpm2tgz and makepkg a SW package, but why is it up to me? It's not like there' only 10 people or so using SW, let alone debian (and -oids like Knoppix). Apart from that I used SuSE.. umm... "used" SuSE for two years and can't say that rpm does too great regarding dep tracking. Maybe that's SuSE specific, tho. Dex -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d--(+)@ s-:+ a-- C++(+++) UL>+++ P+>++ L++>++++ E-- W++ N+ o? K- w--(---) !O M-- V- PS+ PE(+) Y+>++ PGP- t+(++) 5 X+(++) R++ tv--(+)@ b++(+++) DI+++ D G++(--) e* h r%>* y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ http://www.againsttcpa.com - nothing fights like the opposition