RPM should be renamed to WTF

Dexter Filmore <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:23:09 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usability.annoyances
Organization SCHWA Corporation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Why does any company which makes first steps towards linux assume RPM was the
answer of the Gods?
I happily run Slackware, and If I switch one day (because updating SW is a
hassle) it's gonna be debian for sure - no rpm there either (for Bob's sake!).
Now being the owner of a Radeon board I installed the ATI drivers but had to
use rpm, so it won't show up in /var/log/packages, where SW stores info about
installed software. 
Upgrading those drivers is even more fun.
Ok, I could rpm2tgz and makepkg a SW package, but why is it up to me? It's not
like there' only 10 people or so using SW, let alone debian (and -oids like
Knoppix).

Apart from that I used SuSE.. umm... "used" SuSE for two years and can't say
that rpm does too great regarding dep tracking. Maybe that's SuSE specific,
tho.

Dex


-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d--(+)@ s-:+ a-- C++(+++) UL>+++ P+>++ L++>++++ E-- W++ N+ o? K- w--(---) 
!O M-- V- PS+ PE(+) Y+>++ PGP- t+(++) 5 X+(++) R++ tv--(+)@ b++(+++) DI+++ D 
G++(--) e* h r%>* y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

http://www.againsttcpa.com - nothing fights like the opposition