RE: graphical file managers
"John" <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Oct 2003 20:20:14 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3F8EFD7E.11069.3817CB@localhost> |
On 15 Oct 2003 at 21:28, Pablo Vieira wrote: > > I agree absolutely. The thing is, Microsoft is responsible for some > pieces running under windows, but not all of them. If I have a problem > with Photoshop I'll go to Adobe, if there's something wrong with Norton > Internet Security, I'll ask Symantec. There are hundreds of packages > inside a distro. Who's responsible for each of them? (I might mean > "liable" if the software causes some damage in some way too.) > I'd like to see you try to prove Microsoft 'liable' for anything. All their warannties deny any responsibility for anything that may happen through the use of their software. And the same goes for Adobe, Norton etc... > > Agreed again. I'm only trying to find out what happens when not everyone > is nice enough and things still don't work. Ask Microsoft, they are experts at not helping you :^)