VistA an example of FOIA, public domain and FLOSS in actionRe: US Govt Licensing (was licensing)
Joseph Dal Molin <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:39:12 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usage.government |
|---|---|
| Organization | e-cology corporation |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Open source opens up a whole world of possibilities for software developed with government funds. One of the great ironies is that in the land of MS and as imperfect as the US system is, (BTW I am a Canadian...so this isn't flag waving) it has produced one of the world's most remarkable "seeds" for an open source based technology transfer strategy...VistA the integrated hospital information system developed by the Veteran's Administration. VistA has been available through FOIA for many years (easily I might add because there have been so many requests)...there have been some implementations outside of the VA such as in the Indian Health Service and abroad...but not much more. There is a small community of developers that work with it and in particular its foundation software (MUMPS). But what has given it a real spark of life in the last couple of years is the application of the open source model to VistA by an evolving new community of users and developers. WorldVistA is a not for profit we have formed to provide stewardship of the code and coordination of effort. There is still a lot to learn and a lot to do...but what is clear is that the combination of the FLOSS model with taxpayer funded software provides a very rich alternative for both economic development and technology transfer...especially for education, health care and public administration. Having spent the first half of my career in the public sector the other huge benefit I see is the empowerment it offers public sector employees whose creativity and energy have IMHO been stifled....but I digress. A better understanding is needed of the value of open source as a tech transfer strategy and as a fine tuning of the public domain approach. Joseph -- Joseph Dal Molin <[email protected]> e-cology corporation On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 10:24, Taran Rampersad wrote: > Jan C. Depner wrote: > > >'Nuther point - not all software developed by a contractor for the US > >government is copyright by the company. The government can specify that > >in the contract. > > > >Jan > > > So the infrastructure is there, but if the software is not copyright the > company - it defaults to public domain, right? > > Taran