Bug in usb_match_one_id()?

Alan Stern <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Greg:

When you refactored the USB device-matching code, you may have introduced 
a bug.  Does it seem reasonable that an entry might contain both 
device-specific and interface-specific criteria to match?  In which case 
both sets of matches would have to succeed, not just one.

So is the patch below needed?  If yes, I'll send it with a proper patch 
comment and S-O-B.

Alan Stern


Index: usb-2.6/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
===================================================================
--- usb-2.6.orig/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
+++ usb-2.6/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
@@ -415,8 +415,8 @@ int usb_match_one_id(struct usb_interfac
 	intf = interface->cur_altsetting;
 	dev = interface_to_usbdev(interface);
 
-	if (usb_match_device(dev, id))
-		return 1;
+	if (!usb_match_device(dev, id))
+		return 0;
 
 	/* The interface class, subclass, and protocol should never be
 	 * checked for a match if the device class is Vendor Specific,


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.