Re: [RFC] HID bus design overview.

"Dmitry Torokhov" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usb.devel,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 4/2/07, Jiri Kosina <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Li Yu wrote:
>
> > Hi, I do not think that using blacklist in base driver for this purpose
> > is good idea. If so, we need modify source when each new HID device
> > driver come, that's so ugly.
>
> Hi Li,
>
> well, the drivers are exceptions from the generic handling, so creating an
> exceptional rule (entry in hid_blacklist) for them is not that bad. OK,
> it's not the nicest thing on earth probably, but serves the purpose in
> current vendors-trying-to-break-hardware-in-the-most-original-way world
> quite well.
>

Potentially we could even generate 2nd blacklist table automatically
by scanning MODULE_DEVICE_TABLEs for all drivers in HID directory and
merge it with the table we currently maintain in hid-input.c

> This is going to cause some headache to out-of-tree drivers. Oh well, do
> we care that much?

They still can be made to work using bind/unbind via sysfs, but at
this moment there are 0 drivers for HID bus and hopefully people will
be submittin them for inclusion.

-- 
Dmitry

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.