Re: How should an exit routine wait for release() callbacks?

On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:12:47 -0700,
Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ah, just found this original thread, now Cornelia's patches make more
> sense...

I would have included a pointer, but couldn't access marc yesterday
evening, sorry...

> 
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:24:58AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Tejun, it just occurred to me that you would be interested in this email 
> > thread.  Just to bring you up to speed, here's the original question:
> > 
> > > I've got a module which registers a struct device.  (It represents a
> > > virtual device, not a real one, but that doesn't matter.)
> 
> Wait, that's the issue right there.
> 
> Don't do that.
> 
> devices should be created by busses or the platform core, which owns the
> release function for them.  Individual drivers should not create
> devices.

There are drivers that do it, for a variety of reasons.

> 
> Hm, but then, how would you ever unload a bus, as the same issue might
> be there too...

Exactly :) This would imply busses/subsystems could never be unloadable
modules.

> 
> Any specific code in the kernel you can point to that has this issue
> today?

zfcp comes to mind. They register some units in zfcp_aux.c, which don't
have anything to do with the bus the zfcp adapter is on (the ccw bus).
Currently, that is "solved" by disallowing zfcp module unloading.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel