Re: Possible bug in isp116x-hcd

On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, ok wrote:

> Hi Alan,
> 
> Do you mean something like that below? I haven't tested it.

Yes, something very much like this.  It could be simplified a little;  
in a couple of places where you have

	finish_request();
	spin_unlock();
	continue;

you ought to be able to use a "goto" or "break" instead.  Also there
are a few minor problems, like calling finish_request before it is
declared and calling it before releasing urb->lock, but those can 
easily be fixed.

If you like, I'll try revising your patch.  You'll have to test it 
though; I don't have the hardware.

Alan Stern


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel