Re: [PATCH] USB: Only enable autosuspend by default on certain device classes

Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usb.devel,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am Freitag 03 August 2007 schrieb Matthew Garrett:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:01:08PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> 
> > Seems to me it ought to be practical to organize a database that can
> > be consulted by an outcall from udev, disabling autosuspend on devices
> > which are known to be broken.  The "modules.usbmap" syntax is an obvious
> > place to start (painful though it is), and I'm sure there are folk who
> > would prefer web-accessible/updatable databases.
> 
> It's certainly possible to do that, but it's also possible to have a 
> userspace solution that whitelists devices. The question is whether the 
> default kernel behaviour should be "Save power, but potentially break 
> some of my devices" or "Don't break my devices, but use some more 
> powre".

If both options have drawbacks, IMHO we follow the standard, which
says that devices must support suspension.

	Regards
		Oliver


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.